Improvement of pregnancy outcome by extending embryo culture in IVF-ET during clinical application

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the application value of the extended embryo culture for 7–8 h in day 3 morning during IVF-ET process. Methods: Embryos were retrospectively assessed during 08:00–09:00 on the morning of day 3 in the control group, and were assessed once again at 16:00 in the afternoon in the extended culture (EC) group. The embryos with good developmental potential were preferentially selected to transfer. The cumulative pregnancy outcomes were analyzed in one oocyte retrieval cycle. Results: Similar proportions were found in the rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy, cumulative live birth, and the perinatal/neonatal outcomes per oocyte retrieval cycle (P CloseSPigtSPi 0.05). But higher total clinical pregnancy rate, higher total implantation rate, and lower total abortion rate were obtained in the EC group (P OpenSPiltSPi 0.05). After EC, 53.58% of the embryos were able to continue to develop. The transferred embryos were mainly composed of ≥ 8-cell embryos (75.90%) in the EC group and ≤ 8-cell embryos (82.92%) in the control group. Interestingly, the implantation rates were increasingly improved with the increasing blastomere number up to 56.31% at the morula stage in the EC group, while they were limited to 32.33% at 8-cell stage in the control group. Conclusions: The extended culture of day 3 embryos for 7–8 h not only reduced the risk of IVF-ET treatment compared to blastocyst culture through another 2–3 days, but also improved the clinical outcomes and the efficiency of every transferred cycle and every transferred embryo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, X., Ma, B., Mo, S., Ma, L., Chang, F., Zhang, L., … Wang, L. (2018). Improvement of pregnancy outcome by extending embryo culture in IVF-ET during clinical application. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(2), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1065-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free