Contribution of contact sampling in increasing sensitivity of poliovirus detection during a polio outbreak-Somalia, 2013

1Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. In May 2013, a wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1) outbreak reported in Somalia provided an opportunity to examine the contribution of testing contacts to WPV detection.Methods. We reviewed acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) case-patients and linked contacts reported in the Somalia Surveillance Database from May 9 to December 31, 2013. We restricted our analysis to AFP case-patients that had ≥ 3 contacts and calculated the contribution of each contact to case detection.Results. Among 546 AFP cases identified, 328 AFP cases had ≥ 3 contacts. Among the 328 AFP cases with ≥ 3 contacts, 93 WPV1 cases were detected: 58 cases (62%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-72%) were detected through testing stool specimens from AFP case-patients; and 35 cases (38%; 95% CI, 28%-48%) were detected through testing stool specimens from contacts, including 19 cases (20%; 95% CI, 14%-30%) from the first contact, 11 cases (12%; 95% CI, 7%-20%) from the second contact, and 5 cases (5%; 95% CI, 2%-12%) from the third contact. Among the 103 AFP cases with ≥ 4 contacts, 3 (6%; 95% CI, 2%-16%) of 52 WPV1 cases were detected by testing the fourth contact. No additional WPV1 cases were detected by testing >4 contacts.Conclusions. Stool specimens from 3 to 4 contacts of persons with AFP during polio outbreaks are needed to maximize detection of WPV cases. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moturi, E., Mahmud, A., Kamadjeu, R., Mbaeyi, C., Farag, N., Mulugeta, A., … Ehrhardt, D. (2016). Contribution of contact sampling in increasing sensitivity of poliovirus detection during a polio outbreak-Somalia, 2013. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free