Curbside Consults in Clinical Medicine: Empirical and Liability Challenges

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In most U.S. jurisdictions, clinicians providing informal "curbside" consults are protected from medical malpractice liability due to the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. A recent Minnesota Supreme Court case, Warren v. Dinter, offers the opportunity to reassess whether the majority rule is truly serving the best interests of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zacharias, R. L., Feldman, E. A., Joffe, S., & Lynch, H. F. (2021). Curbside Consults in Clinical Medicine: Empirical and Liability Challenges. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2021.83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free