In most U.S. jurisdictions, clinicians providing informal "curbside" consults are protected from medical malpractice liability due to the absence of a doctor-patient relationship. A recent Minnesota Supreme Court case, Warren v. Dinter, offers the opportunity to reassess whether the majority rule is truly serving the best interests of patients.
CITATION STYLE
Zacharias, R. L., Feldman, E. A., Joffe, S., & Lynch, H. F. (2021). Curbside Consults in Clinical Medicine: Empirical and Liability Challenges. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2021.83
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.