Empirical vs Bayesian approach for estimating haplotypes from genotypes of unrelated individuals

7Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The completion of the HapMap project has stimulated further development of haplotype-based methodologies for disease associations. A key aspect of such development is the statistical inference of individual diplotypes from unphased genotypes. Several methodologies for inferring haplotypes have been developed, but they have not been evaluated extensively to determine which method not only performs well, but also can be easily incorporated in downstream haplotype-based association analyses. In this paper, we attempt to do so. Our evaluation was carried out by comparing the two leading Bayesian methods, implemented in PHASE and HAPLOTYPER, and the two leading empirical methods, implemented in PL-EM and HPlus. We used these methods to analyze real data, namely the dense genotypes on X-chromosome of 30 European and 30 African trios provided by the International HapMap Project, and simulated genotype data. Our conclusions are based on these analyses. Results: All programs performed very well on X-chromosome dat a, with an average similarity index of 0.99 and an average prediction rate of 0.99 for both European and African trios. On simulated data with approximation of coalescence, PHASE implementing the Bayesian method based on the coalescence approximation outperformed other programs on small sample sizes. When the sample size increased, other programs performed as well as PHASE. PL-EM and HPlus implementing empirical methods required much less running time than the programs implementing the Bayesian methods. They required only one hundredth or thousandth of the running time required by PHASE, particularly when analyzing large sample sizes and large umber of SNPs. Conclusion: For large sample size s (hundreds or more), which most association studies require, the two empirical methods might be used since they infer the haplotypes as accurately as any Bayesian methods and can be incorporated easily into downstream haplotype-based analyses such as haplotype-association analyses. © 2007 Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps

12731Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data

6672Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome

4934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A common haplotype in NAPEPLD is associated with severe obesity in a Norwegian population-based cohort (the HUNT study)

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Haplotype inference from diploid sequence data: Evaluating performance using non-neutral MHC sequences

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting multiallelic genes using unphased and flanking single nucleotide polymorphisms

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, S. S., Cheng, J. H., & Zhao, L. P. (2007). Empirical vs Bayesian approach for estimating haplotypes from genotypes of unrelated individuals. BMC Genetics, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-8-2

Readers over time

‘08‘09‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 9

47%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

59%

Mathematics 5

29%

Chemical Engineering 1

6%

Chemistry 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0