Sex- and age-related differences in morphine requirements for postoperative pain relief

225Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sex-related differences in the perception of pain and susceptibility to opioids remain a matter of debate. Intravenous morphine titration used to obtain pain relief in the immediate postoperative period is a unique clinical model for assessing the effect of sex on reported pain. Because of the wide variation in dose requirements for pain management, the authors conducted a prospective study in a large population and also assessed the effect of aging. Methods: Intravenous morphine titration was administered as a bolus of 2 (body weight ≤ 60 kg) or 3 mg (body weight > 60 kg) during the immediate postoperative period. The interval between each bolus was 5 min. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) threshold required to administer morphine was 30, and pain relief was defined as a VAS score of 30 or less. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Results: Data from 4,317 patients were analyzed; 54% of the patients were male, and 46% were female. The mean morphine dose required to obtain pain relief was 11.9 ± 6.8 mg or 0.173 ± 0.103 mg/kg. Women had a higher initial VAS score (74 ± 19 vs. 71 ± 19; P < 0.001) and required a greater dose of morphine (0.183 ± 0.111 vs. 0.165 ± 0.095 mg/kg; P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in elderly (aged > 75 yr) patients (0.163 ± 0.083 vs. 0.157 ± 0.085 mg/kg). Conclusion: Women experienced more severe postoperative pain and required a greater dose (+11%) of morphine than men in the immediate postoperative period. This sex-related difference disappeared in elderly patients. © 2005 American Society of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aubrun, F., Salvi, N., Coriat, P., & Riou, B. (2005). Sex- and age-related differences in morphine requirements for postoperative pain relief. Anesthesiology, 103(1), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200507000-00023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free