Limited Resources, Priorities, and Corruption

  • Zwitter M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the situation in countries with a national healthcare system and do not cover countries with private healthcare insurance or those where services are paid out of pocket. Very few countries can meet all the costs of modern medicine for all their citizens. The three consequences of the gap between the available resources and the costs of modern medicine are limited access to costly medical interventions, waiting times for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and list of priorities. From the ethical standpoint, it is essential that all three of these issues are openly discussed and agreed within a wide circle including medical professionals and representatives of the lay community. In case of lack of democratic agreement and of clear rules, access to medical care may depend on the social and/or economic position of an individual. In a society based on solidarity, such a situation is contrary to the ethical principle of justice and may be considered to be a form of corruption.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zwitter, M. (2019). Limited Resources, Priorities, and Corruption. In Medical Ethics in Clinical Practice (pp. 63–71). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00719-5_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free