Is adequate pain relief and time to analgesia associated with emergency department length of stay? A retrospective study

37Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the association of adequate analgesia and time to analgesia with emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS). Setting and Design: Post hoc analysis of real-time archived data. Participants: We included all consecutive ED patients ≥18 years with pain intensity >6 (verbal numerical scale from 0 to 10), assigned to an ED bed, and whose pain was re-evaluated less than 1 h after receiving analgesic treatment. Outcome measures: The main outcome was ED-LOS in patients who had adequate pain relief (AR=↓50% pain intensity) compared with those who did not have such relief (NR). Results: A total of 2033 patients (mean age 49.5 years; 51% men) met our inclusion criteria; 58.3% were discharged, and 41.7% were admitted. Among patients discharged or admitted, there was no significant difference in ED-LOS between those with AR (median (25th-75th centile): 9.6 h (6.3-14.8) and 18.2 h (11.6-25.7), respectively) and NR (median (25th-75th centile): 9.6 h (6.6-16.0) and 17.4 h (11.3-26.5), respectively). After controlling for confounding factors, rapid time to analgesia (not AR) was associated with shorter ED-LOS of discharged and admitted patients (p<0.001 and <0.05, respectively). When adjusting for confounding variables, ED-LOS is shortened by 2 h (95% CI 1.1 to 2.8) when delay to receive analgesic is <90 min compared with >90 min for discharged and by 2.3 h (95% CI 0.17 to 4.4) for admitted patients. Conclusions: In our study, AR was not linked with short ED-LOS. However, rapid administration of analgesia was associated with short ED-LOS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sokoloff, C., Daoust, R., Paquet, J., & Chauny, J. M. (2014). Is adequate pain relief and time to analgesia associated with emergency department length of stay? A retrospective study. BMJ Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free