Organizational Communication on Twitter: Differences Between Non-Profit and For-Profit Organizations in the Context of Climate Change

  • Holmberg K
  • Hellsten I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Twitter as a socio-technical platform provides organizations with new ways to reach their stakeholders. In this paper, we compare the use of Twitter specific affordances – such as hashtags, mentions of usernames and sharing of URLs along the tweets in a sample of 1520 tweets sent by 16 profit organizations, and 1042 tweets sent by 18 non-profit organizations in the context of climate change debate. We also compare the use of Twitter for information sharing, engaging in the community and calls-for-action (Lovejoy & Saxton 2012) between the organizations. Our results show that nonprofit organizations used Twitter more for engaging in community than profit organizations whose tweets were almost completely (96%) about information sharing. Non-profit organizations shared more hashtags than profit-organizations, in particular hashtags related to campaigns and events. We can conclude that the two types of organizations used Twitter specific affordances differently to reach their targeted audiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holmberg, K., & Hellsten, I. (2016). Organizational Communication on Twitter: Differences Between Non-Profit and For-Profit Organizations in the Context of Climate Change. In Crossmedia-Kommunikation in kulturbedingten Handlungsräumen (pp. 305–313). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11076-5_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free