The Ethics of Vaccination

  • Giubilini A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The principle of least restrictive alternative (PLRA) states that policymakers have significant reason to implement the policy that is effective in achieving a certain result and that is least restrictive of individual liberty or autonomy. This chapter provides a ranking of vaccination policies, or an intervention ladder, on the basis of the PLRA, assessing the level of coercion of each type of policy. The ranking of vaccination policies I suggest, in order of increasing restrictiveness or coerciveness, is as follows: persuasion, nudging, financial incentives, disincentives (including withholding of financial benefits, taxation, and mandatory vaccination), and outright compulsion. Each type of policy suggestion is presented with a discussion of the level of restrictiveness or coerciveness involved and the potential effectiveness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giubilini, A. (2019). The Ethics of Vaccination. The Ethics of Vaccination. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02068-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free