Energy consumption evaluation of a routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks in mesh scenarios for precision agriculture

14Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sensor nodes are small, low-cost electronic devices that can self-organize into low-power networks and are susceptible to data packet loss, having computational and energy limitations. These devices expand the possibilities in many areas, like agriculture and urban spaces. In this work, we consider an IoT environment for monitoring a coffee plantation in precision agriculture. We investigate the energy consumption under low-power and lossy networks considering three different network topologies and an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standardized Low-power and Lossy Network (LLN) routing protocol, the Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL). For RPL, each secondary node selects a better parent according to some Objective Functions (OFs). We conducted simulations using Contiki Cooja 3.0, where we considered the Expected Transmission Count (ETX) and hop-count metric (HOP) metrics to evaluate energy consumption for three distinct topologies: tree, circular, and grid. The simulation results show that the circular topology had the best (lowest) energy consumption, being 15% better than the grid topology and 30% against the tree topology. The results help the need to improve the evolution of RPL metrics and motivate the network management of the topology.

References Powered by Scopus

5411Citations
2914Readers
Get full text

MAC essentials for wireless sensor networks

432Citations
290Readers
Get full text
143Citations
210Readers

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sales, F. O., Marante, Y., Vieira, A. B., & Silva, E. F. (2020). Energy consumption evaluation of a routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks in mesh scenarios for precision agriculture. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143814

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

71%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 11

41%

Engineering 9

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0