Growth monitoring: Testing the new guidelines

14Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective-To assess the impact of recent guidelines from the UK joint working party of child health surveillance recommending that all children be measured at age 5 and again between 7 and 9 years of age to determine how many normal school age children are likely to be referred for specialist assessment. Methods-The longitudinal data of 486 children measured by school nurses in a community setting were examined and compared with measurements made in a research setting by a single, skilled observer. Main outcome measures-Number of children identified as having abnormal stature (< 0.4th or > 99.6th centile) and abnormal growth rate height standard deviation score (HSDS) change > 0.67). Results-The community survey identified seven (1.4%) children as having abnormal stature (four short, three tall), 11 (2.3%) were identified as 'slow growing', and nine (1.9%) increased their HSDS by more than 0.67. These results were comparable to data collected in ideal research conditions. Conclusions-Following the recommendations would not result in an excess number of inappropriate referrals. However, this study highlights several unresolved issues such as interobserver variablity and time interval between measurements. A large scale prospective study should be considered to establish realistic and cost-effective criteria before implementation of a national screening programme.

References Powered by Scopus

Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990

1268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965 part II

1223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Growth curve for girls with Turner syndrome

346Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Growth monitoring

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards evidence based referral criteria for growth monitoring

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of knowledge, training and experience of observers on the reliability of anthropometric measurements in children

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulligan, J., Voss, L. D., McCaughey, E. S., Bailey, B. J. R., & Betts, P. R. (1998). Growth monitoring: Testing the new guidelines. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 79(4), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.79.4.318

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

57%

Researcher 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free