Fixation Not Required: Characterizing Oculomotor Attention Capture for Looming Stimuli

7Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A stimulus moving toward us, such as a ball being thrown in our direction or a vehicle braking suddenly in front of ours, often represents a stimulus that requires a rapid response. Using a visual search task in which target and distractor items were systematically associated with a looming object, we explored whether this sort of looming motion captures attention, the nature of such capture using eye movement measures (overt/covert), and the extent to which such capture effects are more closely tied to motion onset or the motion itself. We replicated previous findings indicating that looming motion induces response time benefits and costs during visual search Lin, Franconeri, & Enns(Psychological Science 19(7): 686–693, 2008). These differences in response times were independent of fixation, indicating that these capture effects did not necessitate overt attentional shifts to a looming object for search benefits or costs to occur. Interestingly, we found no differences in capture benefits and costs associated with differences in looming motion type. Combined, our results suggest that capture effects associated with looming motion are more likely subserved by covert attentional mechanisms rather than overt mechanisms, and attention capture for looming motion is likely related to motion itself rather than the onset of motion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, J. E., & Neider, M. B. (2015). Fixation Not Required: Characterizing Oculomotor Attention Capture for Looming Stimuli. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(7), 2247–2259. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0950-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free