Critical Care Management of Status Epilepticus at a Tertiary Care University Hospital

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to review the critical care management of patients with SE focusing on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as well as to determine the optimal dosing strategies of phenytoin (PHT) and predictors of its effectiveness. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with SE admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital, Canada, was conducted. Results: Fifty-six admissions were included. Benzodiazepines (BDZs) were initially given in 89% of our patients. Following BDZs, PHT and levetiracetam were the most commonly initiated AEDs as first- and second-line agents and were deemed effective in 30/44 and 5/11 patients, respectively. Patients who received a PHT loading dose (LD) of 1000 mg were less likely to reach target levels compared with a weight-based LD ≥15 mg/kg (29% vs. 60%). Likewise, patients who received a maintenance dose (MD) of 300 mg/day were less likely to reach target compared with 400 mg/day or >5 mg/kg per day; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Three variables were found to be associated with PHT effectiveness: tonic-clonic SE (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.02-24.7, p = 0.048), history of seizures and BMI <30 kg/m2 (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-1.07, p = 0.059). Conclusions: Further studies of the predictors of PHT effectiveness, specifically obesity, are necessary to help individualize care. Finally, we suggest that PHT should be loaded according to the guidelines as 20 mg/kg followed by an MD of at least 400 mg/day or >5 mg/kg per day.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahmoud, S. H., Marette, V., Lindqvist, T., & Ahmed, S. N. (2019). Critical Care Management of Status Epilepticus at a Tertiary Care University Hospital. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 46(6), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2019.278

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free