Autonomics: In search of a foundation for next-generation autonomous systems

41Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The potential benefits of autonomous systems are obvious. However, there are still major issues to be dealt with before developing such systems becomes a commonplace engineering practice, with accepted and trustworthy deliverables. We argue that a solid, evolving, publicly available, community-controlled foundation for developing next-generation autonomous systems is a must, and term the desired foundation “autonomics.” We focus on three main challenges: 1) how to specify autonomous system behavior in the face of unpredictability; 2) how to carry out faithful analysis of system behavior with respect to rich environments that include humans, physical artifacts, and other systems; and 3) how to build such systems by combining executable modeling techniques from software engineering with artificial intelligence and machine learning.

References Powered by Scopus

CYC: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure

1355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reluplex: An efficient smt solver for verifying deep neural networks

1127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An open approach to autonomous vehicles

471Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trustworthy human-AI partnerships

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial Intelligence in the Military: An Overview of the Capabilities, Applications, and Challenges

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Requirements Engineering for Machine Learning: A Review and Reflection

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harel, D., Marron, A., & Sifakis, J. (2020). Autonomics: In search of a foundation for next-generation autonomous systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(30), 17491–17498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2003162117

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

64%

Researcher 9

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 21

54%

Engineering 12

31%

Social Sciences 3

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free