Pixantrone-rituximab versus gemcitabine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

16Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We describe the rationale and design of the ongoing randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy of pixantrone and rituximab versus gemcitabine and rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular grade 3 lymphoma, who are ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, and who failed front-line regimens containing rituximab. The administration schedule is pixantrone 50 mg/m2 intravenously (iv.) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 iv. on days 1, 8 and 15, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv. on day 1, up to six cycles. Pixantrone has a conditional European marketing approval for monotherapy in adults with multiple relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our trial explores the efficacy of combining pixantrone with rituximab and completes postauthorization measures. Trial registration number: NCT01321541.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belada, D., Georgiev, P., Dakhil, S., Inhorn, L. F., Andorsky, D., Beck, J. T., … Hübel, K. (2016). Pixantrone-rituximab versus gemcitabine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Future Oncology, 12(15), 1759–1768. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2016-0137

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free