Automatically designing robot controllers and sensor morphology with genetic programming

4Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Genetic programming provides an automated design strategy to evolve complex controllers based on evolution in nature. In this contribution we use genetic programming to automatically evolve efficient robot controllers for a corridor following task. Based on tests executed in a simulation environment we show that very robust and efficient controllers can be obtained. Also, we stress that it is important to provide sufficiently diverse fitness cases, offering a sound basis for learning more complex behaviour. The evolved controller is successfully applied to real environments as well. Finally, controller and sensor morphology are co-evolved, clearly resulting in an improved sensor configuration. © 2010 IFIP.

References Powered by Scopus

Noise and the reality gap: The use of simulation in evolutionary robotics

455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Embedded robotics: Mobile robot design and applications with embedded systems: Second edition

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolutionary techniques in physical robotics

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adaptation of sensor morphology: An integrative view of perception from biologically inspired robotics perspective

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning fuzzy controllers in mobile robotics with embedded preprocessing

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hybrid robot controller synthesis with GP and UETPN

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bonte, B., & Wyns, B. (2010). Automatically designing robot controllers and sensor morphology with genetic programming. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 339 AICT, pp. 86–93). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16239-8_14

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Researcher 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

67%

Engineering 3

20%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free