ANALISIS KEWENANGAN DPR TERHADAP POLEMIK PENGGANTIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

  • Azis F
  • Ramur I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Therefore, the Indonesian constitution guarantees the independence of the judiciary from the intervention of other institutions. The polemic of the removal of a judge of the Constitutional Court by the House of Representatives has left a negative precedent in the Indonesian state administration. Moreover, Indonesia adheres to a system of separation of power or power sharing, where no one institution is higher than another state institution. Judicial power institutions are required to have freedom in carrying out their duties and functions. The dynamics of dismissing the Constitutional Court judge annulled the independence of the Constitutional Court. From the point of view of its own authority, the DPR cannot remove a judge from the Constitutional Court.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azis, F. A., & Ramur, I. (2023). ANALISIS KEWENANGAN DPR TERHADAP POLEMIK PENGGANTIAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 4(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v4i1.153

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

50%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0