The prognostic significance of indoleamine-2,3- Dioxygenase and the recepto rs for transforming growth facto r β and interferon γ in metastatic lymph nodes in malignant melanoma

14Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyzed the prognostic significance of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and type 1 receptors for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-βR1) and interferon gamma (IFN-γR1) in resected nodal metastases of 48 malignant melanoma patients. In 32 cases the corresponding skin tumors were available. We used immunohistochemical (IHC) staining which was assessed by pathologists and by a computer-aided algorithm that yielded quantitative results, both absolute and relative. We correlated the results with the patient outcome. We identified absolute computer-assessed IDO levels as positively correlated with increased risk of death in a multivariate model (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002-1.04; p = 0.03). In univariate analysis, patients with IDO levels below the median had a better overall survival time (30.3 vs. 17.5 months; p = 0.03). TGF-βR1 and IFN-γR1 expression was modestly correlated (R = 0.34; p < 0.05) and TGF-βR1 expression was lower in lymph nodes than in matched primary skin tumors (Z = 2.87; p = 0.004). The pathologists’ and computer-aided IHC assessment demonstrated high correlation levels (R = 0.61, R = 0.74 and R = 0.88 for IDO, TGF-βR1 and IFN-γR1, respectively). Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase is prognostic for the patient outcome in melanoma with nodal involvement and should be investigated prospectively for its predictive significance. IHC assessment by computer-aided methods is recommended as its gives IHC more objectivity and reproducibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pelak, M. J., Śnietura, M., Lange, D., Nikiel, B., & Pecka, K. M. (2015). The prognostic significance of indoleamine-2,3- Dioxygenase and the recepto rs for transforming growth facto r β and interferon γ in metastatic lymph nodes in malignant melanoma. Polish Journal of Pathology, 66(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2015.57249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free