Outcomes, Measures and Recovery After Ambulatory Surgery and Anaesthesia: A review

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ambulatory surgery is becoming increasingly adopted and today more complex procedures and not only ASA 1–2 patients are scheduled to undergo surgery according to a fast track concept. Rapid recovery and resumption of capacity to stand, walk, void, eat and drink is essential for safe discharge. There is, however, an increasing need for better way to assess and measure recovery and outcome after surgery and anaesthesia. Morbidity and unplanned admission are no longer deemed adequate for assessing quality of performance or to use as tool to measure efforts to improve the medical care and or logistics. There are several aspects that should be considered when analysing the recovery process and measuring outcome after ambulatory surgery and anaesthesia. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery scale is a multi-dimensional tool that has been shown to be able to quantify and discriminate the recovery process. This review will provide an overview of recovery and outcome following ambulatory surgery/anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brattwall, M., Warren-Stomberg, M., & Jakobsson, J. (2014, December 1). Outcomes, Measures and Recovery After Ambulatory Surgery and Anaesthesia: A review. Current Anesthesiology Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-014-0068-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free