This chapter investigates the meaning of the term "accountability", as it is used in policy discussions surrounding armed groups. It takes a detailed look at literature from public administration on the concept of procedural accountability and applies it to the various accountability mechanisms that evaluate the conduct of armed groups against international norms. In doing so, the chapter points out some of the shortcomings of some of these accountability mechanisms. It ends by examining some of the more innovative accountability models, such as the process created by Geneva Call and the ad hoc processes created by the UNAMA field office in Afghanistan vis-à-vis the Taliban.
CITATION STYLE
Fortin, K. (2018). Armed Groups and Procedural Accountability: A Roadmap for Further Thought. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 19, 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-213-2_6
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.