The haemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopentone for induction of caesarean section

42Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Forty Chinese women for elective caesarean section received either propofol 2 mg.kg1 or thiopentone 4 mg.kg1 for induction of general anaesthesia. Systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate were recorded non-invasively every minute for ten minutes. Postinduction arterial pressures were similar to pre-induction values with no differences between thiopentone and propofol. Following intubation, the rise in systolic arterial pressure was greater in the thiopentone group, 32.1 mmHg (SD 23.7) compared with the propofol group, 17.4 mmHg (SD 23.8), (P < 0.05). In the thiopentone group, arterial pressures were slower in returning to baseline values. Heart rate was initially elevated in both groups to the same degree. At caesarean section, induction with propofol causes less variation in arterial pressure than thiopentone. Hypotension is probably prevented by the coincident stimulus of rapid sequence induction. Neonatal Apgar scores were similar between the two groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gin, T., Gregory, M. A., & Oh, T. E. (1990). The haemodynamic effects of propofol and thiopentone for induction of caesarean section. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 18(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9001800203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free