Comfort and Safety in Conditional Automated Driving in Dependence on Personal Driving Behavior

Abstract

When changing from active driving to conditional automated driving (CAD), the question arises whether users still prefer their own driving behavior while being a passenger. The aim of this paper is to analyze driving behavior preferences in CAD based on the perception of comfort and safety, taking the personal driving behavior into account. Furthermore, it is investigated if users are able to manually demonstrate their desired driving behavior for CAD. Data on the personal, desired and experienced automated driving behavior of 42 participants from a real-world study was used to investigate both research questions for car-following (CF) and decelerating to a lead vehicle (DL) situations. In a first step, the personal and desired driving behavior is compared with the automated driving behavior based on selected parameters. Subsequently, the relationship between behavior differences and the assessed situation comfort and safety is analyzed. The results show a dependency between differences of personal and automated driving behavior and subjective ratings for comfort and safety. Furthermore, results suggest that participants prefer a driving behavior similar to or more defensive than their own for CAD. Our findings also show that participants were able to demonstrate their desired comfort driving behavior in CF and DL situations.