Primary vesicoureteral reflux; what have we learnt from the recently published randomized, controlled trials?

24Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, progress has been made on understanding the relationship between vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and urinary tract infection (UTI). The findings on recent prospective, randomized, controlled studies have questioned the conventional VUR clinical significance and, therefore, have challenged the traditional diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. These new studies have redefined the pathogenic role of vesicoureteral reflux in UTI as well as have disputed the routine use of urinary antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent UTI and renal damage in VUR patients. The time to overinvestigate and treat the vast majority of otherwise healthy children who have an uncomplicated UTI with long-term antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be over. Is there a role of severe VUR in the development of chronic renal disease and renal failure? New ideas are needed to answer these questions with the goal to avoid repeating past mistakes when therapeutic choices were based on expert opinions rather than facts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garin, E. H. (2019, September 1). Primary vesicoureteral reflux; what have we learnt from the recently published randomized, controlled trials? Pediatric Nephrology. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4045-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free