There are many metrics available to compare phylogenetic trees since this is a fundamental task in computational biology. In this paper, we focus on one such metric, the ℓ∞-cophenetic metric introduced by Cardona et al. This metric works by representing a phylogenetic tree with n labeled leaves as a point in ℝn(n+1)∕2 known as the cophenetic vector, then comparing the two resulting Euclidean points using the ℓ∞ distance. Meanwhile, the interleaving distance is a formal categorical construction generalized from the definition of Chazal et al., originally introduced to compare persistence modules arising from the field of topological data analysis. We show that the ℓ∞-cophenetic metric is an example of an interleaving distance. To do this, we define phylogenetic trees as a category of merge trees with some additional structure, namely, labelings on the leaves plus a requirement that morphisms respect these labels. Then we can use the definition of a flow on this category to give an interleaving distance. Finally, we show that, because of the additional structure given by the categories defined, the map sending a labeled merge tree to the cophenetic vector is, in fact, an isometric embedding, thus proving that the ℓ∞-cophenetic metric is an interleaving distance.
CITATION STYLE
Munch, E., & Stefanou, A. (2019). The ℓ ∞-Cophenetic Metric for Phylogenetic Trees As an Interleaving Distance. In Association for Women in Mathematics Series (Vol. 17, pp. 109–127). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11566-1_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.