Method for the analysis of the relationship between forest cover and streamflow in watersheds

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relationship between forest cover and streamflow of watersheds is com-plex and still controversial in the scientific literature. To investigate such relationship we propose an alternative method which requires the following infor-mation for each watershed: percentage of forest cover, annual rainfall, average specific streamflow (qave), and minimum mean specific streamflow in seven consecutive days (q7). As a case study, we analyzed a dataset composed by 25 watersheds located in the Espírito Santo State (ESS), Brazil. We conducted sim-ple and multiple linear regression analyses as well as partial correlation analysis between the above parameters. To reduce the effect of heterogeneity of environmental factors, watersheds with similar characteristics in term of rain-fall, drainage area, and both rainfall and drainage area were grouped by cluster analysis, and the above regression and correlation analysis was repeated on each group. Our results using the whole dataset showed that forest cover has a negative relationship with watershed streamflow. The analysis of homo-geneous groups of watersheds showed that the average minimum streamflow during seven days (q7) was more sensitive to the presence of forest cover, showing a negative relationship, especially in watersheds with low annual rain-fall, while in areas with high precipitation, the annual rainfall showed a strong influence on the hydrological responses of watersheds, masking the effect of forest cover. The proposed method may be easily extended to other areas, and allows the inclusion of other relevant environmental variables according to specific cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferraz, F. T., Zanetti, S. S., Cecílio, R. A., de Carvalho, D., & de Oliveira, F. R. (2021). Method for the analysis of the relationship between forest cover and streamflow in watersheds. IForest, 14(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3536-014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free