Basic quality controls used in skin tissue engineering

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reconstruction of skin defects is often a challenging effort due to the currently limited reconstructive options. In this sense, tissue engineering has emerged as a possible alternative to replace or repair diseased or damaged tissues from the patient’s own cells. A substantial number of tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) have been conceived and evaluated in vitro and in vivo showing promising results in the preclinical stage. However, only a few constructs have been used in the clinic. The lack of standardization in evaluation methods employed may in part be responsible for this discrepancy. This review covers the most well-known and up-to-date methods for evaluating the optimization of new TESSs and orientative guidelines for the evaluation of TESSs are pro-posed.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutaneous wound healing

5079Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seria cultivation of strains of human epidemal keratinocytes: the formation keratinizin colonies from single cell is

4130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Permanent Coverage of Large Burn Wounds with Autologous Cultured Human Epithelium

1165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recent advances in 3D printing for wound healing: A systematic review

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Histochemical and Immunohistochemical Methods for the Identification of Proteoglycans

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of the current state of natural biomaterials in wound healing applications

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linares-Gonzalez, L., Rodenas-Herranz, T., Campos, F., Ruiz-Villaverde, R., & Carriel, V. (2021, October 1). Basic quality controls used in skin tissue engineering. Life. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11101033

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

33%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free