The Coming of Age of Anthropological Practice and Ethics

  • Briody E
  • Pester T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Anthropology as a discipline is well over 100 years old; as a profession it is just gearing up. It is the diversity of anthropological work, not simply by subfield and geographic location, but by job function that has contributed to the field’s expansion. This growth has led to ethical questions and issues surrounding anthropological identity, adaptation, and collegiality, as increasing numbers of anthropologists are finding alternatives to the work of the professor. While the “split” or “divide” between academic and nonacademic work now seems narrower, much more needs to be done to acknowledge that practitioners are a growing and contributing segment of the field. As the career paths of anthropologists continue to differentiate, efforts will be necessary to unify anthropology so that the work of practitioners is considered on par with academics. This article takes on that challenge and proposes solutions to help practice and academia work together to advance the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Briody, E. K., & Pester, T. M. (2014). The Coming of Age of Anthropological Practice and Ethics. Journal of Business Anthropology, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v1i1.4260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free