Promotion of group restructuring and cross-entity liability arrangements

Abstract

Modern enterprises often operate as interconnected groups of companies. This is facilitated by various cross-entity liability arrangements, which aim at risk mitigation and control, and may contribute to the reduced agency cost of debt. However, they pierce limited liability (cross-guarantees) or impose correlation between the fates of separate entities (intercompany cross-defaults and ipso facto clauses). They can promote group exposure and disincentivise debtors from taking early actions to avoid insolvency. This paper explores the tools that are embraced to address these problems to achieve group restructuring. They include restrictions of cross-entity ipso facto clauses and extension of enforcement stays to group entities. I examine the ex ante and ex post effects of group liability arrangements, make a comparative overview of national law responses and suggest recommendations to find a balanced approach to cross-entity liability arrangements, enhance the existing legal regimes and form the basis for future reforms of insolvency laws.