Financial liabilities and environmental implications of unplugged wells for the Gulf of Mexico and coastal waters

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Plugging and abandoning (P&Aing) wells is a policy priority because unplugged wells present potential financial and environmental risks to the public. Offshore wells, compared with land wells, generally produce more, cost more to P&A and present different environmental risks. Here we estimate that the cost to P&A all 14,000 unplugged, non-producing wells in US Gulf of Mexico offshore waters, inland waters and wetlands is US$30 billion. Wells in shallower waters closer to shore make up 90% of inactive wells but only 25% of total P&A costs. They also present larger environmental risks. Prior owners of wells in federal waters (deeper and farther from shore) can be held liable for P&A costs if the current owner does not P&A them. We find that 88% of outstanding P&A liability in federal waters is associated with wells currently or formerly owned by one of the large, financially stable ‘supermajor’ companies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agerton, M., Narra, S., Snyder, B., & Upton, G. B. (2023). Financial liabilities and environmental implications of unplugged wells for the Gulf of Mexico and coastal waters. Nature Energy, 8(5), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01248-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free