Relative risk of pulmonary embolism in the very elderly compared with the elderly

0Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be an acute, life-threatening emergency, and studies suggest that advanced age is a risk factor for this condition. However, the literature is scarce regarding PE in patients above the age of 90 years. This study examined the relative risk for PE in the very elderly (>90 years) compared with that in the elderly (80-89 years). Methods: A retrospective study was performed examining very elderly patients diagnosed with PE in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University Hospital Homburg/Saar in Germany between 2004 and 2012. Elderly patients (aged 80-89 years) diagnosed with PE served as controls. PE was confrmed by contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography or ventilation perfusion scintigraphy in both groups. A total of 2230 patients were examined for PE in this study. Of these, 15 (0.67%) in the study group and 197 (8.83%) in the control group underwent further evaluation for PE. Results: After performing a radiological examination, 11 (73.3%, including six [54.55%] women) of the 15 study patients (mean age 91.6 ± 1.67 years) and 148 (75.1%, including 93 [62.84%] women) of the 197 controls (mean age 84.0 ± 2.59 years) were confrmed to have PE. There was a signifcantly lower proportion of the very elderly enrolled in the study (P, < 0.001). There were no signifcant differences in clinical presentation, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiograms, blood gas analyses, radiological diagnoses, or acute comorbidities between the groups. However, the very elderly were more likely to experience minor bleeding in the extremities (P = 0.016) and to have more chronic diseases (P < 0.001). An increased relative risk of PE was not detected in the very elderly (relative risk 0.98, P = 0.88). Furthermore, d-dimer, troponin T, and high-sensitive troponin T levels had limited predictive value for PE in the very elderly. There were no signifcant differences in the number of hospital admissions, intensive care or ward treatments, or duration of hospitalization. Conclusion: The relative risk for PE in the very elderly is not higher than that in the elderly. © 2013 Yayan, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yayan, J. (2013). Relative risk of pulmonary embolism in the very elderly compared with the elderly. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 8, 861–870. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S46572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free