Impact of simulation-based training on bougie-assisted cricothyrotomy technique: a quasi-experimental study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cricothyrotomy is a lifesaving surgical technique in critical airway events. However, a large proportion of anesthesiologists have little experience with cricothyrotomy due to its low incidence. This study aimed to develop a multisensory, readily available training curriculum for learning cricothyrotomy and evaluate its training effectiveness. Methods: Seventy board-certificated anesthesiologists were recruited into the study. Participants first viewed an instructional video and observed an expert performing the bougie-assisted cricothyrotomy on a self-made simulator. They were tested before and after a one-hour practice on their cricothyrotomy skills and evaluated by a checklist and a global rating scale (GRS). Additionally, a questionnaire survey regarding participants’ confidence in performing cricothyrotomy was conducted during the training session. Results: The duration to complete cricothyrotomy was decreased from the pretest (median = 85.0 s, IQR = 72.5–103.0 s) to the posttest (median = 59.0 s, IQR = 49.0–69.0 s). Furthermore, the median checklist score was increased significantly from the pretest (median = 30.0, IQR = 27.0-33.5) to the posttest (median = 37.0, IQR = 35.5–39.0), as well as the GRS score (pretest median = 22.5, IQR = 18.0–25.0, posttest median = 32.0, IQR = 31.0-33.5). Participants’ confidence levels in performing cricothyrotomy also improved after the curriculum. Conclusion: The simulation-based training with a self-made simulator is effective for teaching anesthesiologists to perform cricothyrotomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, Y., Gao, H., Wang, Q., Zhi, J., Liu, Q., Xia, W., … Yang, D. (2024). Impact of simulation-based training on bougie-assisted cricothyrotomy technique: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05285-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free