Babel Fees via Limited Liabilities

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Custom currencies (ERC-20) on Ethereum are wildly popular, but they are second class to the primary currency Ether. Custom currencies are more complex and more expensive to handle than the primary currency as their accounting is not natively performed by the underlying ledger, but instead in user-defined contract code. Furthermore, and quite importantly, transaction fees can only be paid in Ether. In this paper, we focus on being able to pay transaction fees in custom currencies. We achieve this by way of a mechanism permitting short term liabilities to pay transaction fees in conjunction with offers of custom currencies to compensate for those liabilities. This enables block producers to accept custom currencies in exchange for settling liabilities of transactions that they process. We present formal ledger rules to handle liabilities together with the concept of babel fees to pay transaction fees in custom currencies. We also discuss how clients can determine what fees they have to pay, and we present a solution to the knapsack problem variant that block producers have to solve in the presence of babel fees to optimise their profits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chakravarty, M. M. T., Karayannidis, N., Kiayias, A., Peyton Jones, M., & Vinogradova, P. (2022). Babel Fees via Limited Liabilities. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 13269 LNCS, pp. 707–726). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09234-3_35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free