Antibody specific for the peptide·major histocompatibility complex: Is it T cell receptor-like?

23Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Antibodies recognizing peptide bound to a major histocompatability complex (MHC) protein usually have a higher affinity for the composite peptide·MHC (pMHC) ligand than T cell receptors (TCR) with the same specificity. Because the solvent-accessible peptide area constitutes only a small portion of the contacting pMHC surface, we hypothesized that the contribution of the MHC moiety to the TCR-pMHC complex stability is limited, ensuring a small increment of the binding energy delivered by the peptide to be distinguishable by the TCR or the peptide-specific antibody. This suggests that the gain in affinity of the antibody-pMHC interaction can be achieved through an increase in the on-rate without a significant change in the off-rate of the interaction. To test the hypothesis, we have analyzed the binding of an ovalbumin peptide (pOV8) and its variants associated with soluble H-2K b protein to the 25-D1.16 monoclonal antibody and compared it with the binding of the same pMHC complexes to the OT-1 TCR. This comparison revealed a substantially higher on-rate of the antibody-pMHC interaction compared with the TCR-pMHC interaction. In contrast, both the antibody and the TCR-pMHC complexes exhibited comparably fast off-rates. Sequencing of the 25-D1.16 V H and VL genes showed that they have very few somatic mutations and those occur mainly in framework regions. We propose that the above features constitute a signature of the recognition of MHC-bound peptide antigens by TCR and TCR-like antibodies, which could explain why the latter are rarely produced in vivo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mareeva, T., Lebedeva, T., Anikeeva, N., Manser, T., & Sykulev, Y. (2004). Antibody specific for the peptide·major histocompatibility complex: Is it T cell receptor-like? Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(43), 44243–44249. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M407021200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free