Falls and major orthopaedic surgery with peripheral nerve blockade: A systematic review and meta-analysis

136Citations
Citations of this article
151Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

SummaryThe objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the risk for falls after major orthopaedic surgery with peripheral nerve blockade. Electronic databases from inception through January 2012 were searched. Eligible studies evaluated falls after peripheral nerve blockade in adult patients undergoing major lower extremity orthopaedic surgery. Independent reviewers working in duplicate extracted study characteristics, validity, and outcomes data. The Peto odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from each study that compared continuous lumbar plexus blockade with non-continuous blockade or no blockade using a fixed effects model. Ten studies (4014 patients) evaluated the number of falls as an outcome. Five studies did not contain comparison groups. The meta-analysis of five studies [four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one cohort] compared continuous lumbar plexus blockade (631 patients) with non-continuous blockade or no blockade (964 patients). Fourteen falls occurred in the continuous lumbar plexus block group when compared with five falls within the non-continuous block or no block group (attributable risk 1.7%; number needed to harm 59). Continuous lumbar plexus blockade was associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk for falls [Peto OR 3.85; 95% CI (1.52, 9.72); P=0.005; I2=0%]. Evidence was low (cohort) to high (RCTs) quality. Continuous lumbar plexus blockade in adult patients undergoing major lower extremity orthopaedic surgery increases the risk for postoperative falls compared with non-continuous blockade or no blockade. However, attributable risk was not outside the expected probability of postoperative falls after orthopaedic surgery. © 2013 © The Author [2013]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

26142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty a randomized, double-blind study

283Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison with Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities

223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, R. L., Kopp, S. L., Hebl, J. R., Erwin, P. J., & Mantilla, C. B. (2013). Falls and major orthopaedic surgery with peripheral nerve blockade: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet013

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

61%

Researcher 17

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 83

87%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

3%

Psychology 3

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0