Why and How to Define an Artist: Types of Definitions and Their Implications for Empirical Research Results

  • Mitchell R
  • Karttunen S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in the study of the arts and artists in the social sciences, particularly in sociology but also in economics and political science. This naturally leads us to the theoretical debate about what an artist is in modern and more especially in postmodern society. It also brings up for discussion the methodological --- and more practical --- problem how to define who an artist is at a given time and space. The need to contrast ``who'' and ``what'' indicates that the study of the artists is due to more than one type of knowledge constituting interest (Habermasian Erkenntnis intresse).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, R., & Karttunen, S. (1992). Why and How to Define an Artist: Types of Definitions and Their Implications for Empirical Research Results. In Cultural Economics (pp. 175–185). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77328-0_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free