Epidemic Surveillance of Covid-19: Considering Uncertainty and Under-Ascertainment

36Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Epidemic surveillance is a fundamental part of public health practice. Addressing under-ascertainment of cases is relevant in most surveillance systems, especially in pandemics of new diseases with a large spectrum of clinical presentations as it may influence timings of policy implementation and public risk perception. From this perspective, this article presents and discusses early evidence on under-ascertainment of COVID-19 and its motifs, options for surveillance, and reflections around their importance to tailor public health measures. In the case of COVID-19, systematically addressing and estimating under-ascertainment of cases is essential to tailor timely public health measures, and communicating these findings is of the utmost importance for policy making and public perception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ricoca Peixoto, V., Nunes, C., & Abrantes, A. (2020). Epidemic Surveillance of Covid-19: Considering Uncertainty and Under-Ascertainment. Portuguese Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free