Orbital implants in retinoblastoma patients: 23 years of experience and a review of the literature

35Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate complications of different types of orbital implants following enucleation for retinoblastoma. Methods We performed a retrospective chart study of all patients that underwent enucleation as treatment of retinoblastoma between April 1991 and June 2013. Events of implant exposure, extrusion (defined as a complete loss of the implant, or a major exposure that could not be closed) and socket abnormalities were analysed for association with implant type and influence of additional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and/or chemotherapy. Results A total of 224 enucleations in 216 patients (eight bilateral) were identified. Mean age at surgery was 1.9 (median 1.5) years. Of the 219 included enucleated eyes, 20 were not replaced by a primary implant and 18 were replaced by an Allen implant. Scleral wrapped hydroxyapatite (HA) and acrylic implants (polymethylmethacrylate) were inserted in, respectively, 79 and 102 cases. In the total population, 29 treatment or implant-specific events (13.2%) were registered. Main complications were implant exposure n = 10 (4.6%) and extrusion n = 6 (2.7%). The acrylic/sclera group had less exposures or extrusions (5 of 102, 4.9%) compared to the HA/sclera group (10 of 79, 12.7%), although this difference did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). Additional treatment (chemotherapy and/or EBRT for the fellow eye) was administered in 78 cases (35.8%). The overall complication rate in the entire study population was significantly higher (16.7% versus 5.7%) in the group exposed to additional therapy (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.30-8.36 p = 0.008). This negative effect of additional therapy was also significant in the combined acrylic/HA group (OR 2.9; 95% CI 0.97-8.46 p = 0.048). Conclusion Our results suggest a favourable outcome for acrylic implants compared to the HA implant. Additional treatment with chemotherapy and/or EBRT is associated with an increased risk of complications.

References Powered by Scopus

The technique of ophthalmic arterial infusion therapy for patients with intraocular retinoblastoma

276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Results of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma

259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: Histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Orbital implants: State-of-the-art review with emphasis on biomaterials and recent advances

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Orbital Implants in Enucleation Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy in the primary management of advanced intra-ocular retinoblastoma: first 4-year experience from a single institution in Turkey

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mourits, D. L., Moll, A. C., Bosscha, M. I., Tan, H. S., & Hartong, D. T. (2016). Orbital implants in retinoblastoma patients: 23 years of experience and a review of the literature. Acta Ophthalmologica, 94(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12915

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

82%

Researcher 2

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

77%

Chemistry 2

8%

Social Sciences 2

8%

Engineering 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free