Explanations for Different Opposition Competitiveness Degrees in African Dominant Party Systems

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter follows a “Rokkanian” perspective of critical junctures and historical legacies of political cleavages to explain institutionalization and strength of the opposition in African dominant party systems of the third wave of democratization. Competitive opposition is rooted in historical legacies of cleavages that were formed during the first pre-independence elections and survived the political vicissitudes after decolonization. The chapter develops a quantitative measurement of historical legacies of cleavages and successfully tests its purported positive influence based on a data set of 53 elections in 18 African party systems characterized by one-party dominance, clientelism and valence competition. In sum, to be more immune against factionalism as well as co-optation by the dominant party, opposition parties need a “brand identity” based on historical political conflict.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eerd, J. (2017). Explanations for Different Opposition Competitiveness Degrees in African Dominant Party Systems. In Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century (pp. 61–114). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50838-2_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free