The quest for rationalism without Dogmas in Leibniz and Toulmin

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to connect Leibniz's and Toulmin's conceptions about practical and deliberative rationality. When trying to rationally justify contingent judgments Leibniz, like Toulmin, defends a weighing argumentative method. Thus, in Leibniz we can discern the balance between the legitimate demands of formal models of rationality and the lessons of a practice "situated on a historical, social, and evaluative context (theoria cum praxi). © 2006 Springer.