Experimentally elicited productions: Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Currently, many experimental studies of speech production use fully counterbalanced designs to examine variation in categorical (e.g, correct/incorrect) or relatively continuous measures (e.g., reaction times, voice onset times). These data present several challenges to ANOVA analyses. Some of these issues are well known to be the speech community; for example, the non-normality of dependent variables such as proportion correct. Others have been less extensively addressed; for example, many speech studies account for participant-but not item-specific contributions to variance. I discuss the opportunities and challenges in using linear mixed effects models to address these issues. © 2013 Acoustical Society of America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldrick, M. (2013). Experimentally elicited productions: Differences and similarities between mixed effects and ANOVA analyses. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (Vol. 19). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4793583

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free