Institutional trust, political participation, and corruption – a european comparative perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the theoretical and political importance of the relationship between institutional trust and different forms of political participation in Europe, theoretical and empirical focus on post-industrial economies leave the literature wanting of explanations of cross-national variation in political participation. In this article, we test whether levels of corruption influence the relationship between institutional trust and participation. We rely on the 9th wave of the European Social Survey results for an in-depth analysis of the relationship between institutional trust, political participation, and perceived corruption in 27 countries. The multilevel regression analysis results show that the effect of institutional trust on institutionalised political participation (including voting) is moderated by corruption. However, corruption does not moderate the relationship between institutional trust and non-institutionalised forms of participation.

References Powered by Scopus

All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust

972Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corruption: A review

353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Co-partisanship with mayors, institutional performance, and citizen trust in local governance institutions: Evidence from Tunisia

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does Discrimination in Childhood Reduce Trust and Participation Among Adult Immigrants?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zafirović, J., Matijević, B., & Filipović, B. (2021). Institutional trust, political participation, and corruption – a european comparative perspective. Sociologija, 63(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2102336Z

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Psychology 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0