Three Perspectives on IFN

  • van der Zweerde E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Like all other Soviet philosophical disciplines, IFN had its specific nature and background: rather than being a mere ‘application’ or ‘extension’ of the ‘system of dialectical and historical materialism’, it had a status of its own as a professional discipline. IFN was an historiography and a theory of the history of philosophy, and should be seen not only as part of Soviet philosophical culture, but also from the general perspective of historiography of philosophy. Therefore, the first part of this chapter assesses the status and central issues of history of philosophy as a discipline [1.i].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Zweerde, E. (1997). Three Perspectives on IFN (pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8943-7_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free