Opioid: Plenitude versus pittance

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The opioid crisis in the USA and in other developed countries can potentially affect low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The licit medical use of opioids has two sides. The USA and high-income countries maintain abundant supply for medical prescription. Between 1990 and 2010, the use of opioids for cancer pain relief was overtaken by a dramatic rise in the opioid prescriptions for non-cancer acute or chronic pain. The surge led to the opioid epidemic, recognized as social catastrophe in the USA, Canada and in some countries in Europe. From 2016, the medical community, health policy regulators and law-makers have taken actions to tackle this opioid crisis. On the other side, formulary deficiency and low opioid availability exists for three-fourths of the global population living in LMICs. Physicians and nurses in Asia and Africa engaged in cancer pain relief and palliative care face a constant paucity of opioids. Millions of patients in LMICs, suffering from life-modifying cancer pain, do not have access to morphine and other essential opioids, due to restrictive opioid policies. Attention will be needed to improve opioid availability in large parts of the world, even though the opioid crisis has led to control the licit medical use in the USA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohanti, B. K. (2023). Opioid: Plenitude versus pittance. The National Medical Journal of India, 35(5), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_539_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free