Comparison between two methods for estimating pneumothorax size from chest X-rays

32Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the estimated size of spontaneous pneumothoraces using the established Rhea inter-pleural distances method with the CT-derived Collins method. Method: Adult patients with spontaneous pneumothorax treated conservatively were identified from the ED databases. X-rays were reviewed independently by two researchers and measured according to the methods described by Rhea and Collins. Estimates of size derived by the two methods were compared using bias plot analysis techniques. Results: A total of 156 X-rays in 57 patients were identified. A total of 82% were male with a median age of 22 years. Pneumothoraces varied in size from 4% to 88%. The average difference between methods was 4% (Collins method estimating larger size) with 95% limits of agreement -3.8% to 11.7%. Agreement was very close for small pneumothoraces but deteriorated with increasing pneumothorax size (Collins methods estimated larger pneumothorax size). Conclusion: The Rhea method for estimating pneumothorax size is acceptably accurate for smaller pneumothoraces but may significantly under-estimate the size of larger pneumothoraces. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, A. M., Weldon, D., Tsang, A. Y. L., & Graham, C. A. (2006). Comparison between two methods for estimating pneumothorax size from chest X-rays. Respiratory Medicine, 100(8), 1356–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2005.11.022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free