Registration of catheter-related complications in adverse events reporting systems: a major underestimation of the real complication practice

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reporting and learning from preventable adverse events is crucial to improve patient safety. Although physicians should file and analyse adverse events by law in The Netherlands, it is unknown if these reporting systems are sufficiently used in clinical practice. This study is a substudy of the multicenter RICAT trial, a successful quality improvement project to reduce inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters in medical wards in seven hospitals, in which we screened 5696 patients and documented 803 catheter-related complications. We also checked the adverse events reporting systems of these patients and found that only 13 (1.6%) of 803 catheter-related complications were registered. Of the infectious complications only five (10.9%) of 46 catheter-associated bloodstream infections and urinary tract infections were registered. We conclude that the reported complications were a major underestimation of the real complication practice in medical wards in The Netherlands. The RICAT trial is registered at Netherlands Trial Register, trial NL5438.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laan, B. J., Godfried, M. H., & Geerlings, S. E. (2022). Registration of catheter-related complications in adverse events reporting systems: a major underestimation of the real complication practice. Journal of Infection Prevention, 23(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211012455

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free