Equal results with laparoscopic and Shouldice repairs of primary inguinal hernia in men. Report from a prospective randomised study

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the laparoscopic and Shouldice techniques for repair of inguinal hernia. Material: 261 healthy men over 50 years with primary, unilateral inguinal hernia were randomly allocated to laparoscopic (total extraperitoneal approach, TEP) treatment (n = 131) or to a modified Shouldice technique (n = 130). Results: Apart from a longer operative time in the laparoscopic group, there were no significant differences between the two methods with regard to perioperative complications, hospital stay, recurrencies or pain in the groin. Conclusions: Results following the total extraperitoneal laparoscopic and the Shouldice technique do not differ significantly 2 years after hernia repair.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wennström, I., Berggren, P., Åkerud, L., & Järhult, J. (2004). Equal results with laparoscopic and Shouldice repairs of primary inguinal hernia in men. Report from a prospective randomised study. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 93(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690409300107

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free