Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+

46Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Wrist-worn accelerometers are increasingly used in epidemiological studies to record physical activity. The accelerometer data are usually only analyzed if the convention for compliant wear time is met (i.e. ≥ 10 h per day) but the algorithms to detect wear time have been developed based on data from hip-worn devices only and have not been tested in a free-living setting. The aim of this study was to validate the automatic wear time detection algorithms of one of the most frequently used devices in a free-living setting. Methods: Sixty-eight adults wore one ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer on the wrist and one on the hip and additionally recorded wear times for each device separately in a diary. Monitoring phase was during three consecutive days in a free-living setting. Wear time was computed by the algorithms of Troiano and Choi and compared to the diary recordings. Results: Mean wear time was over 1420 min per day for both devices on all days. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for the wrist-worn wear time was 0.73 (0.60; 0.82) when comparing the diary with Troiano and 0.78 (0.67; 0.86) when comparing the diary with Choi. For hip-worn devices the respective values were 0.23 (0.13; 0.33) for Troiano and 0.92 (0.88; 0.95) for Choi. Mean and standard deviation values for absolute percentage errors for wrist-worn devices were - 1.3 ± 8.1% in Troiano and 0.9 ± 7.7% in Choi. The respective values for hip-worn devices were - 17.5 ± 10% in Troiano and - 0.8 ± 4.6% in Choi. Conclusions: Hip worn devices may be preferred due to their higher accuracy in physical activity measurement. Automatic wear-time detection can show high errors in individuals, but on a group level, type I, type II, and total errors are generally low when the Choi algorithm is used. In a real-life setting and participants with a high compliance, the algorithm by Choi is sufficient to distinguish wear time from non-wear time on a group level.

References Powered by Scopus

Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm

1248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations

1226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: The UK biobank study

758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automatic Posture and Movement Tracking of Infants with Wearable Movement Sensors

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer's dementia patients: Results of feasibility and pilot studies

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: A systematic review

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knaier, R., Höchsmann, C., Infanger, D., Hinrichs, T., & Schmidt-Trucksäss, A. (2019). Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

75%

Researcher 10

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 18

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

21%

Psychology 7

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0