Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data

1.0kCitations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Global distributions of UV-absorbing aerosols are obtained using measured differences between the 340 and the 380 nm radiances from the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) for the years 1979-1993. Time series are shown for major sources of biomass burning and desert dust giving the frequency of occurrence and areal coverage over land and oceans. Minor sources of UV-absorbing aerosols in the atmosphere are also discussed (volcanic ash and oil fires). Relative values of year-to-year variability of UV-absorbing aerosol amounts are shown for major aerosol source regions: (1) central South America (Brazil) near 10 ° S latitude; (2) Africa near 0°-20 ° S and 0° to 10 ° N latitude; (3) Saharan Desert and sub-Saharan region (Sahel), Arabian Peninsula, and the northern border region of India; (4) agricultural burning in Indonesia, Eastern China, and Indochina, and near the mouth of the Amazon River; and (5) coal burning and dust in northeastern China. The first three of these regions dominate the injection of UV-absorbing aerosols into the atmosphere each year and cover areas far outside of their source regions from advection of UV-absorbing particulates by atmospheric wind systems. During the peak months, smoke and dust from these sources are transported at altitudes above 1 km with an optical depth of at least 0.1 and can cover about 10% of the Earth's surface. Boundary layer absorbing aerosols are not readily seen by TOMS because the small amount of underlying Rayleigh scattering leads to a small signal. Significant portions of the observed dust originate from agricultural regions frequently within arid areas, such as in the Sahel region of Africa, especially from the dry lake-bed near Lake Chad (13.5 ° N, 14 ° E), and intermittently dry drainage areas and streams. In addition to drought cycle effects, this suggests there may be an anthropogenic component to the amount of dust injected into the atmosphere each year. Detection of absorbing aerosols and calculation of optical depths are affected by the presence of large-scale and subpixel clouds in the TOMS field of view.

References Powered by Scopus

The effect of anthropogenic sulfate and soot aerosol on the clear sky planetary radiation budget

548Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vertical and areal distribution of Saharan dust over the western equatorial north Atlantic Ocean

444Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aerosol absorption measurements at Barrow, Mauna Loa and the south pole

343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation

2654Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust identified with the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) absorbing aerosol product

2353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system

1910Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herman, J. R., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., & Celarier, E. (1997). Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 102(14), 16911–16922. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd03680

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 94

55%

Researcher 57

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 78

53%

Environmental Science 49

33%

Physics and Astronomy 13

9%

Engineering 8

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free