Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities

109Citations
Citations of this article
225Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The impact of the global financial crisis and the economic recession on Southern European countries has threatened the rural welfare of many regions. The loss by emigration of the young population, austerity policies, and the territorial concentration of essential services have led many of rural areas into a spiral of decline. The growth of regional disparities, even among rural areas, is confirmed by the European official reports. Depopulation and rural decline are highly associated with remoteness. Accessibility is one key issue to mitigating this erosion of socio-territorial cohesion; another is mobility, which is the usual way to confront the scarce opportunities and limited services in deeply rural territories. This paper pays attention to socio-territorial inequalities and considers as working hypothesis that social rights are differentiated by the habitat structure; as a result, territory determines different degrees of citizenship. Traditional perspectives focused on the access to productive resources and material opportunities as the source of disadvantages, but we suggest that a more comprehensive approach is needed to address the rural gap: the difference between living conditions and living expectations in rural areas in contrast with urban ones. We address two main processes involved on it. On the one hand, there are strong interconnections between physical and social mobility, such as commuting to distant labor markets and educative centers, which could increase the social mobility of rural youth. On the other hand, the maps of the provision of services, infrastructures networks and investments not only reshape the territories but also their sociological morphologies. Accessibility and mobility are strongly linked with rural well-being and social sustainability. We explore and illustrate these questions with examples from the Spanish case. The text is structured into four issues regarding the rural gap: the territorial imbalance and social cohesion, the demographic imbalance and rural welfare as the product of the inter-generational equilibrium, the rural disparities in accessibility and the challenges of mobility transition. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the rural policies and governance required for achieving social and territorial balance.

References Powered by Scopus

Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world

523Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring

490Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation

353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Faith no more? The divergence of political trust between urban and rural Europe

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The rural exodus of young people from empty Spain. Socio-educational aspects

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Internet access in rural areas: Brake or stimulus as post-covid-19 opportunity?

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camarero, L., & Oliva, J. (2019). Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

58%

Researcher 18

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 31

47%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

17%

Engineering 9

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free