Framing attention in Japanese and American comics: Cross-cultural differences in attentional structure

30Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research on visual attention has shown that Americans tend to focus more on focal objects of a scene while Asians attend to the surrounding environment.The panels of comic books - the narrative frames in sequential images - highlight aspects of a scene comparably to how attention becomes focused on parts of a spatial array. Thus, we compared panels from American and Japanese comics to explore cross-cultural cognition beyond behavioral experimentation by looking at the expressive mediums produced by individuals from these cultures.This study compared the panels of two genres of American comics (Independent and Mainstream comics) with mainstream Japanese "manga" to examine how different cultures and genres direct attention through the framing of figures and scenes in comic panels. Both genres of American comics focused on whole scenes as much as individual characters, while Japanese manga individuated characters and parts of scenes. We argue that this framing of space from American and Japanese comic books simulate a viewer's integration of a visual scene, and is consistent with the research showing cross-cultural differences in the direction of attention. © 2012 Cohn, Taylor-Weiner and Grossman.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception

610Citations
725Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

182Citations
464Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohn, N., Taylor-Weiner, A., & Grossman, S. (2012). Framing attention in Japanese and American comics: Cross-cultural differences in attentional structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00349

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

19%

Researcher 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 18

38%

Arts and Humanities 13

27%

Linguistics 9

19%

Social Sciences 8

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 55

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0